Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
By Bitomat
Over a decade after Bitcoin’s launch, the question of who truly invented it remains unanswered. Bitomat.com has conducted an in-depth investigation to unveil the ten most likely suspects who could be the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto. Drawing from the latest research, rumors, blockchain analyses, and cryptographic insights, Bitomat explores the possible identities behind this digital currency mastermind. Here are the leading candidates:
1. Hal Finney
A pioneering cryptographer and one of the first to engage directly with Bitcoin, Hal Finney received the first-ever Bitcoin transaction from Nakamoto on January 12, 2009, just days after Bitcoin’s launch. Finney’s extensive cryptographic experience includes creating the reusable proof-of-work system that influenced Bitcoin’s mining process. His writing style and online activity patterns closely mirror those of Nakamoto. Interestingly, he lived just blocks away from Dorian Nakamoto in Temple City, California, a fact that has intrigued researchers due to potential overlap.
2. Len Sassaman
Len Sassaman was a well-known figure in the cypherpunk movement and made significant contributions to privacy technologies like the PGP encryption protocol. His death by suicide in July 2011 aligns closely with Nakamoto’s disappearance from public life that same year, which some consider more than a coincidence. Sassaman worked closely with other cryptographers, including Hal Finney, and was highly active in communities that promoted privacy and cryptography. A tribute to Sassaman was even encoded in the Bitcoin blockchain, adding to the speculation.
3. Nick Szabo
Nick Szabo, a computer scientist who created “bit gold” in 1998, has a resume that makes him a credible candidate. Szabo’s concept of bit gold laid much of the groundwork for Bitcoin’s decentralized and digital monetary principles. Linguistic analyses have shown that Szabo’s writing style and word choice are highly similar to Nakamoto’s, which has fueled theories about his identity. Despite his repeated denials, Szabo’s early work in digital currency continues to make him one of the most credible suspects.
4. Dorian Nakamoto
In 2014, Newsweek erroneously identified Dorian Nakamoto, a retired systems engineer with experience in government projects, as the creator of Bitcoin. Dorian Nakamoto has consistently denied the claim, but his shared surname with Satoshi Nakamoto, as well as his technical background, has kept the spotlight on him. He became an unwilling celebrity, and while he has distanced himself from the theory, the coincidences surrounding his identity persist in public discourse.
5. Craig Wright
Wright, an Australian computer scientist, publicly declared himself as Nakamoto in 2016 but failed to provide convincing cryptographic proof, which led to widespread skepticism. Wright has since been involved in numerous lawsuits to assert his claim, further polarizing opinion within the cryptocurrency community. His inability to move any of Nakamoto’s known Bitcoin holdings has cast doubt on his assertions, and a UK court even ruled against his claim to copyright over the Bitcoin white paper.
6. Adam Back
Back is the creator of Hashcash, a proof-of-work system that influenced Bitcoin’s mining algorithm. Despite his denials, Back’s deep involvement in cryptographic development and the fact that he was cited in Nakamoto’s white paper has kept him under suspicion. His early cryptographic contributions and his close connections within the community give credence to the theory that he could be Nakamoto, though he maintains his innocence.
7. Elon Musk
Musk’s vast technological expertise and cryptic public persona have led some to speculate that he could be Nakamoto. Although Musk has publicly denied the connection, his propensity for innovation and disruption aligns with Bitcoin’s philosophy. This theory largely remains fueled by Musk’s massive influence and cryptic behavior, although there is no direct evidence linking him to Bitcoin’s development.
8. Wei Dai
Known for his creation of B-money, a theoretical precursor to Bitcoin, Wei Dai is considered an early influence on Nakamoto. Dai’s work with decentralized digital currency concepts and his affiliations with the cypherpunk movement have led some to speculate that he might be Bitcoin’s creator. Although Dai has not commented publicly on his possible involvement, his foundational ideas in digital currency certainly align with Bitcoin’s design principles.
9. Paul Le Roux
A former cartel boss and skilled programmer, Le Roux’s arrest in 2012 coincides with Nakamoto’s last known activity. Known for his expertise in cryptography and involvement in various illicit activities, Le Roux presents a more unconventional but intriguing suspect. Though there’s no direct proof, his background in creating encryption technologies adds an unexpected twist to the mystery.
10. A Government Project?
Some theories suggest that Bitcoin was a government experiment to test the viability of decentralized currency or as a covert tool for tracking illicit transactions. This theory is speculative but has gained traction among conspiracy theorists who point to the extensive resources and global reach required to launch Bitcoin. While evidence is lacking, the idea persists as part of the broader intrigue surrounding Nakamoto’s identity.
“Hal Finney’s role in Bitcoin’s early days and his cryptographic legacy make him a compelling candidate for Satoshi, and it’s fascinating to see how his connection to the project still fuels speculation.” a spokesperson for Bitomat commented.
“What’s most interesting is how the true identity of Satoshi might change how we view Bitcoin today—whether he’s a single genius, a team, or even a government experiment.”
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.