Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
About four days ago news.Bitcoin.com reported on a dispute concerning the removal of the owner of Bitcoin.org, an anonymous figure known as âCobra.â At the time a Github contributor opened an issue on the websiteâs repository, saying that Cobra had become untrustworthy for showing support towards the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network. Then the CEO of Blockstream and a large swarm of Bitcoin Core supporters insisted the domain should be handed over to someone else. Since then the maintainers of the BTC repository also removed all of the associated links to Bitcoin.org from the Core clientâs website.
Also Read: A Look at What It Was Like to Operate the Lightning Networkâs Largest Node Â
The CEO of Blockstream Thinks Cobra Should Transfer Control to a Trusted Person or Group
Many Bitcoin Core (BTC) proponents have been upset at the owner of Bitcoin.org for showing some support towards the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) protocol. Four days ago a Github contributor opened an issue that stated a number of individuals feared Cobra because he started âsuddenly propagandizing BCH as âThe Real Bitcoin.ââ The individual further noted that he didnât feel comfortable that a pseudonymous person has âtotal control of the Bitcoin.org domain name.â
Then in a different chat channel the CEO of Blockstream, Adam Back, asked Cobra to relinquish control over the domain âto a trusted person or group to hold in trust for the public interest.â Back also lambastes Cobra for caring about âBcashâ and at the very least Cobra should call BCH â âBcash.â Cobra then responds and states âIâm waiting for names Adam.â Back then replies back âCobra maybe Wladimir? â How about in terms of a name you transferred domain control to Theymos â You obviously know, and trust him quite well for many years from several sites and domains youâve both maintained.â
Cobra didnât seem to like Backâs commentary, stating:
Adam, you should not be the CEO of Blockstream. I think you should transfer control of Blockstream to Warren Togami or something⊠Adam, this notion of âcommunity propertyâ only exists in your head because you want to influence who owns Bitcoin.org so they submit to your agenda.
Blockstream CEO, Adam Backâs interesting conversation with Cobra.
Bitcoin.org Links Decoupled from Bitcoincore.org
Following the argument between Back and Cobra, this past Sunday a Github commit to the Bitcoin Core website went viral on cryptocurrency forums and social media. The commit called âAdjust bitcoincore.org linksâ was merged by the most prominent (as far as writing Core code) Bitcoin Core developer, Wladimir van der Laan. Essentially Wladimir removed associated links to Bitcoin.org from the Bitcoincore.org website. Immediately a Github contributor named Daniel Ginovker spoke out against the move to delete the links.
âSeriously? You guys are that upset at Cobra for not denouncing Bitcoin Cash?â Ginovker asks the Core developers.
Cobra, if you read this, I genuinely am on your side at this point. Youâve done an excellent job with Bitcoin.org, and it is in your domain. Donât succumb to this Blockstream bullying forcing you to give up your playing cards.
However, other Core contributors were pleased with the decision to remove Bitcoin.org associations, and Jonas Schnelli explains the decision had nothing to do with Cobra.Â
âThis has nothing to do with Cobra or any other influencer â The reason why we still linked to Bitcoin.org was historical since the domain was once owned by Satoshi,â explains Bitcoin Core developer Jonas Schnelli. âItâs a natural and logical step to decouple the Bitcoin Core project from any centralised organised website â Bitcoin Core is the/a reference implementation of the Bitcoin Protocol and there is no need to link it with any website outside of the projects control.â
Cobra: âBitcoin is Much Bigger Than Bitcoin Coreâ
Following the merge, Cobra writes to his followers on Twitter saying, âBitcoin is much bigger than Bitcoin Core.â
Bitcoin Core (BTC) proponents donât know what to think of Cobra, and itâs safe to say a great majority of BTC supporters donât trust him. Itâs also clear and evident that the angst towards Cobra is because heâs not towing party lines and because he doesnât use the phrase âBcash.â For now, the Github request, the Blockstream CEO, and the slew of Core followers have not phased Cobra, and it doesnât seem like he will be relinquishing the domain any time soon.Â
What do you think about the controversy towards Cobra and the how Core supporters want him to relinquish the Bitcoin.org domain? What do you think about Core developers removing Bitcoin.org links from the website? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comment section below.
Images via Shutterstock, Pixabay, Github, Bitcoin.org, and Reddit.
At news.Bitcoin.com all comments containing links are automatically held up for moderation in the Disqus system. That means an editor has to take a look at the comment to approve it. This is due to the many, repetitive, spam and scam links people post under our articles. We do not censor any comment content based on politics or personal opinions. So, please be patient. Your comment will be published.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.