Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
When developing a product from the ground up, you might think you need a burndown. Do you want to have an overview of how much work is left before your release? Thatâs the general gist of a burndown. You want to be able to sayâââin five weeks Iâll be done. But it never works like that. What ends up happening is that your burn down stays flatâââor goes the opposite way because youâve discovered new requirements. So, are burndown charts useful?
Quick Survey
This isnât a real surveyâââbut out of the four agile teams that started with burndown chartsâââonly one team uses it correctly anymore (if our sprint reviews are anything to go by). One of the major complaints that Iâve heard is that the burndown charts are not useful and havenât been used at all since they were introduced by management (thatâs rightâââit was not introduced by the team, but by management).
Quick question: Who thinks management should introduce new processes into teams? No one? Okay. I guess thatâs your first sign that burndown charts wonât be useful for the teams. No one wants to be forced to fill out some time-based chart that youâll review at the end of the sprint. To be honest, my team moved away from a pen-and-paper burndown to a JIRA-based burndown because we didnât find it useful. We donât use it other than reporting to management.
Usefulness
Why do most teams thenââânot find use out of a burndown? Well, I believe itâs because thereâs too much data to collect. You may think itâs only one small line you have to drawâââbut you need to estimate how much work everyone has really done towards their tasks. In the endâââwhen you use pen and paperâââyou may only draw a line down when a task is completed. Which is also totally okay. How JIRA works is that when you have hours remaining and you log workâââitâll move the chart down. Kind of works. But youâll see in my example below why it also doesnât really work.
Another reason why I think we donât find burndowns useful is that we donât review it at the end of a sprint. We should beâââbut someone always forgets to bring it (or print it out). We should be discussing the flat points and figure out what the problems are and how we could improve it. Letâs take the example below.
If we were to have a retro and include our burndown, firstly you can see the amount of hours recorded is far larger than the hours going down. Why? Thatâs a good question for your retrospective. For us, we already knew about this issue without the burndown. We had a lot of bugs with our story that we were working on, and so there was a lot of work going into the same tasks. These are things that you can discuss at your retrospective if you want. But itâs only useful if your team finds it useful.
Effort v. Reward
I talked about the amount of effort that goes in. I talked about the potential reward. What I didnât talk about was what that really looks like. Letâs say you draw that line every burndown. Someone on your team is responsible. They need to follow what people did the day before and sort of draw that estimate. Maybe you only go down when a task is done? Thatâs how some of the teams did it. Reduce the mental complexity.
But is it worth the effort? From my experience, unless someone wants to do itâââno one will do it. No one will take responsibility for the burndown because who wants to be an engineer drawings lines?
As for the reward? Are you missing something at your retrospectives? Yes? No? If yesâââwould a burndown capture that in a way that would allow you to look back and say âahaâ? If noâââI would say you can skip the burndown.
Summation
Theyâre good at showing how much effort is left and what the problem areas areâââif youâre willing to put in the effort. After a while, you might find that your team talks enough during the retrospective and week that the data is essentially not useful. And thatâs totally okay. Teams grow and outgrow metrics and charts. Donât let management bully you into something you donât need.
Originally published at www.alexaitken.nz on July 2, 2018.
Are Burndown Charts Useful? was originally published in Hacker Noon on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.