Latest news about Bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies. Your daily crypto news habit.
Russian security services ordered Telegram to hand over access to encrypted user messages, but the messaging application (app) refused. Founder Pavel Durov didnât bother to send lawyers to Moscowâs Tagansky court in response, and the court dutifully ruled against his company, taking less than 20 minutes in decreeing an immediate ban.
Also read:Â CBSâs NCIS Los Angeles Weaves Stolen Bitcoin Into Script, LL Cool J Is on the Case
Russian Court Bans Telegram
Dmitri S. Peskov, Kremlin spokesperson, stressed, âThere is a certain legislation that demands certain data to be passed to certain services of the Russian Federation.â Judge Yulia Smolina agreed, ruling, âThe ban on access to information will be in force until the [Federal Security Serviceâs] demands are met on providing keys for decrypting user messages,â TASS reported.
Roskomnadzor, a censuring media body responsible for attempting to ban everything from Github to pornography to white nationalist websites, evidently made the most vigorous argument in urging the court to shutter Telegram. Last month, the company appealed before the Supreme Court over Russiaâs Federal Security Serviceâs (FSB) 800,000 ruble fine. The FSB ordered Telegram to decrypt messages in accordance with relatively recent anti-terrorism laws. âWe donât do deals with marketers, data miners or government agencies. Since the day we launched in August 2013 we havenât disclosed a single byte of our usersâ private data to third parties,â a Telegram blog post insisted.
The only comment made at press time by Pavel Durov, regarding 13 Aprilâs decision, came in a post to his personal Telegram channel, and it seemed every bit defiant as the 33 year old known for, âThe power that local governments have over IT corporations is based on money. At any given moment, a government can crash their stocks by threatening to block revenue streams from its markets and thus force these companies to do strange things (remember how last year Apple moved Icloud servers to China). At Telegram, we have the luxury of not caring about revenue streams or ad sales. Privacy is not for sale, and human rights should not be compromised out of fear or greed.â Mr. Durov is a native of Russia, but bailed in 2014 after his first enterprise, a social networking site called Vkontakte (VK), he claimed, was taken over by Putin in retaliation to Mr. Durovâs then-refusal to hand over user information as well.
Legal Setback for a Company Thriving
Though Telegram has formal appeal rights, the court ruled with a sense of urgency, allowing the Roskomnadzor to take immediate action against the company. An irony not lost on officials is that they too use Telegram for communication purposes, and that includes President Putinâs own press office. Rumors are that it will move to Viber.Â
Telegramâs lawyer, Pavel Chikov, warned, â[Russia has] demonstrated again and again that the court system is devoted to serving the interests of the authorities. They no longer even care about basic external appearances.â Though both Facebook and Google have butted heads with Russian authorities, Telegram is only the second universal platform to be formally banned (Linkedin was the first).
Other than legal woes, the company has been on something of a growth spurt of late. It recently celebrated 200 million users, and is presently raising billions in what is being called the biggest initial coin offering so far.
Do you think Telegram will be impacted by the ban? Let us know in the comments section below.
Images courtesy of Shutterstock.Â
Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section.
The post Russian Court Bans Telegram, Founder Pavel Durov Defiant appeared first on Bitcoin News.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Bitcoin Insider. Every investment and trading move involves risk - this is especially true for cryptocurrencies given their volatility. We strongly advise our readers to conduct their own research when making a decision.